Technology supplier ABB believes that a localised, personalised approach is the way forward as the rail industry aims to achieve decarbonisation. Therefore, investment decisions with regards to rail electrification infrastructure should be made depending on which rail network is being developed.
As well as considering this point of view, ABB shares how the company maximises the benefits of electrification, the importance of low carbon technologies and its efforts in upgrading the Metro Trains Melbourne Hurstbridge Line.
Jasleen Mann speaks with Antonio Colla, global railway marketing & sales manager at ABB, about the rail industry’s potential for decarbonisation.
Jasleen Mann (JM): How can infrastructure impact the decarbonisation of railways?
Antonio Colla (AC): There is no doubt that the global rail industry is facing a challenging time as it pivots to net zero goals, all while meeting soaring demand in the now and remaining primed for future growth.
The good news is we already have many of the low carbon technologies needed to make this transition happen. However, this must be met with significant investment in improving infrastructure to support the deployment and unlock the full potential of sustainable alternatives.
While we continue to see the rapid acceleration of rail electrification investment, for example, at the same time, we are now dealing with an evolving electrical grid amid increased renewable integration and global energy insecurity. Therefore, efficient and intelligent electrification infrastructure that enables electric trains to not only draw their power from the grid but control that power correctly will be key to overall reliability and efficiency.
JM: What is meant by local dynamics and how does this impact the decarbonisation of railways?
AC: From our vast experience of working in the global rail industry for more than 100 years, we understand that rail operations can vary dramatically from country to country.
This can include everything from the volume of demand and future forecasts, through to the conditions of the rail lines themselves, the associated local and national power generation facilities and even seasonality factors.
A lot also depends on the wider political framework and net zero goals. Take, for example, the world’s second largest network, Indian Railways. Because of the sheer volume of energy consumption, India’s national rail network has pledged to fully electrify its tracks by 2023 and achieve net-zero emissions by 2030 in an industry first – a move which is estimated with help India achieve five percent of its Paris Agreement goals.
Conversely, the European Union has committed to double high-speed rail use by 2030 in a bid to bridge missing transport links across the continent, increase interoperability and boost cross-border rail services. The remit here is to provide a much more convenient, more sustainable cross-border alternative to flying or driving via, ultimately, realising a single European network.
In this way, while the end goal of achieving rail decarbonisation may be the same, different networks and regions may take different paths to achieve it.
JM: What challenges arise with a one size fits all approach?
AC: Inherently, because no rail network is the same, a standardised approach will always fall short by failing to address network-specific needs.
Originally published at Melbourne News Vine
No comments:
Post a Comment