Self-pollination artist requests emails about the decision to withdraw funding

He said only a fraction of the emails the Council of Australia sent to Jenkins was submitted, and he declined the estimated cost of $2.4 million to conduct a thorough search of the emails, chats and texts online, including between the authority and the former arts office. Minister Paul Fletcher.

But O’Sullivan said that asking for more and better discovery of the documents was an exercise in fishing for information about the “real reason” for Jenkins’ funding defunding and if it was because of the perceived public backlash.

She said it was not discriminatory, and that council lawyers were looking for information about an “incredibly weak” link. It was not, O’Sullivan said, when the Council of Australia withdrew funding due to government interference.

In a statement on Jenkins’ website in response to the Australian Council’s decision to withdraw funding, they wrote that the work documents a common conceptual practice in Australia.

“I document and present a portion of my live experience as do countless artists. They said nothing in the actions I document is illegal or immoral.

“In my work, I am proud and unashamedly proud of presenting the method of attempting to conceive (self-fertilization) that thousands of people across the country are doing completely legally and ethically.”

loading

The Australian Council said its reasons for canceling the grant include this Immaculate, very clean, very organized ‘exposed [council] to unacceptable, potentially long-term and uncalcable risks.”

She said she “cannot be a party to an act that could bring new life into this world as part of an art project” and “the current and long-term consequences for the child, the child’s parent and the donor are inappropriate for a government agency to accept.”

Jenkins wants a candid apology and for the CEO and chairman to undergo “extensive training” on gender equality, LGBT rights, and unconscious bias.

They are seeking damages from the Board for “defamation and/or tort, breach of contract and breach of duty of care,” as well as declaring that the Board’s decision was unlawful or unfair.

They also want the court to order the board to provide representation quotas to its board of directors and management.

The case continues.

The breaking news alert will notify you of important breaking news as it happens. bring it here.

Source link

Originally published at Melbourne News Vine